Why spanking isn't the answer

"Although most Americans do not like to call it so, spanking is hitting and hitting is
violence. By using the euphemistic term spanking, parents feel justified in hitting
their children while not acknowledging that they are, in fact, hitting. We as a
society have agreed that hitting is not an effective or acceptable way for adults to
resolve their differences, so it should not be a surprise that hitting children, like
hitting adults, causes more problems than it solves. It is time to stop hitting our
children in the name of discipline." Elizabeth T. Gershoff

photo credit: HA! Designs - Artbyheather
via photopin cc

Many thoughtful (some surely not so thoughtful) parents continue to tout the need to keep the wooden paddle looming over little ones on the wall. But many are choosing non-violent options of discipline as the scientific consensus overwhelmingly concludes that spanking has negative affects on children. Since corporal punishment has been swirling in the news lately, I'm adding my two cents on why our home chooses gentle discipline. My words are biased, but they're fair and I hope if nothing else, you'll give spanking a second thought. 

Why we don't spank

Spanking is, condones, and perpetuates violence. It's funny (actually, it's quite sad) that the law prohibits an adult hitting another adult, but protects the parent who hits their child. In other words, hitting is violence against an adult, but productive against a child. No parent wants to admit they commit acts of violence in their own home, but we're mincing words when we say "spank." Even though culture has created a blasé term to mean hitting children, there's nothing passive about it. 

When parents spank, the "do as I say not as I do" mantra is at play because modeling physical force as a problem-solving method is a confusing and backwards message. Parents assume too much when they believe their young toddler can disassociate parental spanking from peer-to-peer aggression. Studies show that children who are repeatedly spanked are 50% more aggressive and more likely to continue the cycle of physical force on siblings, peers, and future partners. Even more frightening is the link between spanking and crime. 

Spanking undermines consent. In a world where sexual exploitation is normalized and the word "no" is powerless, the lesson of consent is invaluable for a child. This might seem extreme to my less crunchy readers, but when I must physically overcome my daughter (changing diapers and clothes, taking toys away, or sucking boogers out of her nose), I try to explain what I'm doing even though she isn't yet holding conversations. Because although I take responsibility for her, I do not own her. Empowering her to take charge of her body can only happen if I respect her in every way possible.

This means being gentle while tickling and reading her body language to see if she's enjoying it. This means not forcing her to be held by a stranger when she's scared and unsure. This means not risking her sense of self and ownership being damaged through hitting. It's irresponsible to let her internalize a silent message that her elders are allowed to touch her body for pleasure (tickling, hugs, cuddling, or, god forbid, sexual abuse) or pain (spanking, yanking, hitting, and abusing).

Spanking weakens attachment. A child instinctively looks to his caregiver(s) when developing a sense of self. As an infant, he cannot help but trust them most to fulfill his physical and emotional needs and begins to internalize his perception of how they feel towards him. But when his most trusted ally inflicts pain, he struggles to grow in closeness to them and loses trust in the goodness of the parents.

It's no surprise that almost all research studying the effects of spanking in the parent-child relationship report that relationships are harmed. Humans avoid pain as much as possible and little humans are no different. When parents are the bearer of pain (physical or emotional), it's understandable that the child doesn't want to be as close to them.

Even if you had a loving childhood, some of your most vivid memories are likely ones where you felt deeply ashamed, humiliated, or afraid. Choosing a more gentle form of discipline protects against needless traumatic events that could very well stay with your child for a lifetime.

Spanking hurts more than the skin. Many people think spanking is harmless. It merely stings the skin, right? The truth is children who are spanked have less grey matter in the brain which is linked to mental illness (depression and anxiety), substance abuse, and a lower IQ. Spanking is also associated with hostile attribution bias (the internalized belief that the world and the people in it are hostile towards them), anti-social behavior and less empathy for others. What a sad worldview for a little one to have.

This is why big name medical, psychological, and social organizations are advising parents not to spank. Thanks to Elizabeth T. Gershoff, here are a few: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (AACAP, 2012), the American Humane Association (2009), the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP, Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child & Family Health, 1998), the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners (NAPNAP, 2011), and the National Association of Social Workers (2012).


Myths of Spanking

Spanking is biblical. 4 proverbs are used to condone spanking as religious instruction and if you are looking for an in-depth study, check out my husband's post that concludes the bible doesn't endorse spanking.

The bible has been used to justify many things, like slavery. But as young parents who can hardly fathom owning another human being, we can easily understand that slavery was allowed within the context of biblical culture, not condoned. It's much harder to think outside the bounds of our own cultural norm and examine whether spanking is mandated by scripture, or a primitive concession. 

If we believe that the world was created by a higher being, then all truth is god's truth. If the bible doesn't mandate spanking and the scientific world has arrived at more than 90% consensus that spanking is damaging, shouldn't we as parents thoughtfully reconsider hitting our children?

Spanking works. Many pro-spanking parents say that it's the most effective form of discipline for their strong-willed/ bad/ troubled/ mean/ aggressive child. The irony is that children who are spanked are more likely to, "be defiant, demand immediate satisfaction of their wants and needs, become frustrated easily, have temper tantrums and lash out physically against other people or animals" (Time, "The Long-Term Effects of Spanking").

Spanking doesn't teach children the positive reasons to behave; it simply teaches them to avoid painful punishment. No wonder children misbehave when the threat of punishment is not imminent.

I was spanked and I turned out ok. That's like saying smoking 10 packs of cigarettes a day is harmless since you've never gotten lung cancer. And with hundreds of studies showing the serious dangers of spanking, consider that you truly can't know who you would have become if you weren't spanked. Maybe you'd have a higher IQ. Maybe you'd be able to trust more easily. Maybe you'd have less anxiety in every day life. I don't know and neither do you.

Parents want the best for their children, but one of the hardest things to do as a human being is to examine your own paradigm or worldview. And if you're a pro-spanking parent taking an honest look at whether spanking is really the best answer, I seriously commend you for being open even if you still choose spanking.

If you want more information on how to discipline without the use of spanking, here's a great website about implementing positive parenting.